<img src="https://secure.office-information-24.com/785669.png" style="display:none;">

How Fast Can You Trace a Complaint Back to Design?

Eight questions, two minutes. See where your traceability strains, from a complaint to its root cause to the design input behind it, and what the costs your team each year.

Start the Stress Test Get a Demo
QMS-For-Med-Device

Where the Time Goes

For many device manufacturers, complaints live in one place, production records in another, CAPAs in a third and the design history file in folders and spreadsheets. Each answer exists. Connecting them is the slow part.

1

Complaint to Lot

Find the device history record for the unit, then the lot, components and suppliers behind it.

2

Lot to Nonconformance

Check whether that lot or component already had a nonconformance or deviation, and whether anyone connected the two.

3

Nonconformance to CAPA

If the investigation opens a CAPA, the evidence has to be re-gathered or re-attached, because the records don’t share links.

4

CAPA to Design

If the root cause points to a design input or a risk control, someone has to find the right revision of the design output, the risk analysis and the verification evidence.

5

Back Again

Any design change has to flow forward into documents, training and production, then be verified.

None of these steps is hard on its own. The time goes into searching, re-keying and proving that records from different systems describe the same thing. Across a complaint investigation, that’s how hours become weeks.

Answer Eight Questions

Move each slider or type an exact number. Your score updates as you go.

11,000+
11,500+
0500+
172
1120
140
024
1200

Email Me My Full Report

Your on-screen score shows how strained your traceability is. The full report shows where the hours go and where to start.

  • Hours breakdown by stage: complaint trace, root cause to design, DHR assembly and audit prep
  • Cost estimate: using the hourly rate you set
  • Three recommendations: matched to your weakest stage
  • The Sunset Healthcare story: how one device maker reached ISO 13485 certification within a year

We’ll email your report. No spam.

“Out of the box, QT9 is head and shoulders above the rest.”
Joe Consoli Director of Quality and Regulatory, Sunset Healthcare Solutions

What One Line Looks Like

When complaints, nonconformances, CAPA, risk and design controls live in one connected QMS, the trace becomes a path you follow, not a project you run.

Why It Matters More Under QMSR

FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation took effect on February 2, 2026, and incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference. That puts more emphasis on how complaint handling, CAPA, risk management and design controls connect as one system. Inspectors following a complaint will expect to follow the thread.

Complaint
Links to the product, lot and customer it came from.
Nonconformance
Links to the complaint and to the lot, component and supplier involved.
CAPA
Opens from the nonconformance and carries its evidence with it.
Risk Assessment
Opens from the same record, so risk decisions stay attached to the event.
Design Controls
Inputs, outputs, reviews and risk sit in the same system, so the investigation can reach the design record without leaving the QMS.
Change Control and Training
Carry the fix forward to documents and the people who use them.