QT9 vs. MasterControl: Features, Differences and Advantages

MasterControl offers deep customization but often requires IT resources and added costs.
QT9 focuses on simple, built-in personalization—like configurable workflows and dashboards—so you can launch faster and manage changes without technical help.

MasterControl pricing typically starts above $25,000/year, and incremental features may incur additional fees. In contrast, QT9 includes everything in a straightforward subscription—better suited for small to mid-size firms CapterraSoftware World.

Both systems support CAPA management, but QT9’s CAPA module earned 9.2 on G2, significantly outperforming MasterControl’s 7.4 rating. Users highlight QT9’s flexible, automated workflows and better visibility into corrective actions G2.

QT9 leads in audit tracking and compliance reporting with an 8.7 audit score on G2, outpacing MasterControl at 6.5. Many users applaud QT9’s robust scheduling, tracking, and dashboards GetApp+14G2+14SourceForge+14.

Risk assessment is stronger in QT9: G2 gives it an 8.3 score, against MasterControl’s 6.9. QT9 offers proactive risk dashboards and simple integration with CAPA and audit modules G2.

QT9 includes built-in training, exams, and LMS features in its modular platform. MasterControl has training tools, though QT9 generally rates higher in usability and speed of deployment—important for regulated industries.

QT9 offers a 30‑day free trial, transparent pricing based on concurrent licenses, and all modules included; MasterControl typically requires contacting sales and starts around US $25,000/year Capterra+14Capterra+14SourceForge+14.

Support is a standout for QT9 users: rated 9.6 vs MC’s 8.5, with many users reporting quick resolution times and high satisfaction with training and onboarding G2Software Advice.

QT9 can be implemented in under 30 days, making it ideal for organizations needing fast ROI. MasterControl is powerful—but typically requires more customization and longer rollout times QT9 Software.