<img src="https://secure.office-information-24.com/785669.png" style="display:none;">
Glossary

Statistical Process Control (SPC)

Full name: Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process Control, or SPC, is a data-driven methodology that uses statistical methods, primarily control charts, to monitor, control and improve a process over time, distinguishing between common cause variation, the natural, expected variation within a stable process, and special cause variation, unpredictable, assignable variation signaling that something has changed. Developed in the 1920s by Walter Shewhart, SPC helps organizations detect when a process is drifting out of control before it produces defective output. 

Quick facts

Category Data-driven process monitoring and variation control
Used by Manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, pharmaceuticals and other industries with repetitive production processes
Also called SPC
Related standards IATF 16949, AIAG SPC reference manual
Related processes Gage R&R, measurement system analysis, six sigma, continuous improvement
Semantic match Statistical Process Control, SPC, control charts, common cause special cause variation

What is Statistical Process Control (SPC)?

SPC plots process data over time using control charts, which display measurements alongside statistically calculated control limits, giving a visual, ongoing picture of whether a process is behaving predictably or has shifted in a way that requires attention.

A stable process shows only common cause variation, the natural, recurring variation inherent to the process itself, producing a consistent, predictable distribution over time. Special cause variation, sometimes called assignable variation, is intermittent and unpredictable, arising from a specific, identifiable issue and showing up as out-of-control signals on a control chart.

SPC tells an organization if and when something unusual has happened in a process, but it does not by itself explain why; when a special cause signal appears, the process must still be investigated to identify and address the underlying issue.

Why is Statistical Process Control (SPC) important?

SPC allows organizations to catch process drift before it produces enough defective output to become a costly quality problem, shifting from reactive inspection to proactive process monitoring.

By distinguishing common cause from special cause variation, SPC prevents two costly mistakes: overreacting to normal process variation as if it were a real problem, and underreacting to genuine special cause signals that actually require investigation.

Organizations that implement SPC effectively commonly see reduced variability, decreased scrap and rework, and improved throughput, since problems are caught and addressed earlier in the process.

How does Statistical Process Control (SPC) work?

A typical SPC implementation includes:

  1. Process selection. Identify critical processes where SPC will have the most impact.
  2. Data collection. Establish reliable systems for collecting and recording process data.
  3. Control chart creation. Plot data over time with calculated control limits.
  4. Variation classification. Distinguish common cause from special cause variation using established rules.
  5. Investigation. Investigate special cause signals to identify their underlying source.
  6. Ongoing monitoring. Continue tracking the process to confirm stability and catch future shifts.

Common Cause vs. Special Cause Variation

Comparison Common Cause Variation Special Cause Variation
Nature Natural, recurring, predictable Intermittent, unpredictable, assignable
Response Generally requires no action Requires investigation and correction

Real-world examples of Statistical Process Control (SPC)

An automotive plant implements SPC on a critical dimension, reducing defect rates significantly within months by catching and addressing process drift before it produced widespread nonconformances.

An IT director uses SPC control charts to track computer crash frequency, identifying and addressing a special cause signal before it become a recurring pattern.

A pharmaceutical company applies SPC to its most costly production line, using early wins to build momentum for broader SPC adoption across additional processes.

Regulations and standards related to Statistical Process Control (SPC)

IATF 16949 commonly expects SPC as part of an automotive supplier's process control toolkit, and the AIAG SPC reference manual provides widely used, standardized guidance for control chart selection and interpretation.

SPC is also a core tool within Lean Six Sigma methodology, used across all five DMAIC phases, from establishing a baseline understanding of process performance through ongoing control after improvements are implemented.

Required by

How QT9 helps with Statistical Process Control (SPC)

QT9 QMS SPC capabilities

  • Support control chart creation and process data tracking.
  • Connect SPC data to calibration and measurement system analysis records.
  • Flag out-of-control signals for investigation and corrective action.
  • Maintain historical process data for baseline and trend comparison.
  • Link SPC findings directly to CAPA and nonconformance records.
  • Provide real-time dashboards for ongoing process monitoring.

Request a QMS Demo Explore IATF 16949 Compliance →

See QT9 Software in Action

Discover how QT9 Software helps manufacturers improve efficiency, strengthen compliance and connect quality management and ERP processes within one integrated platform.

Common mistakes with Statistical Process Control (SPC)

Common mistakes include reacting to every fluctuation in process data as if it were a special cause, when normal common cause variation should generally be left alone rather than adjusted.

Other problems include implementing SPC without first confirming the measurement system itself is reliable through Gage R&R or broader measurement system analysis, risking control charts built on flawed data.

Frequently asked questions

SPC was developed in the 1920s by Walter Shewhart, a statistician at Bell Laboratories, and later spread widely through Japanese manufacturing and, eventually, Six Sigma and Lean methodologies globally.
Common cause variation is the natural, expected variation inherent to a stable process. Special cause variation is intermittent, unpredictable variation caused by a specific, identifiable issue that requires investigation.
No. SPC signals that something unusual has happened through an out-of-control condition on a control chart, but identifying the actual cause requires further investigation once the signal is detected.
Yes. SPC is a key tool used throughout the Lean Six Sigma DMAIC methodology, supporting baseline measurement, root cause analysis and ongoing process control after improvements are implemented.
Reliable data collection systems and a validated measurement system are essential prerequisites, since SPC control charts are only as trustworthy as the underlying data used to build them.
Yes. While rooted in manufacturing, SPC principles have been applied to service processes, IT operations and other repetitive processes where monitoring variation over time provides value.

Related quality management terms

Related content

Ready to Transform Your Business?

See how QT9 Software helps manufacturers simplify operations, improve traceability and drive continuous improvement with integrated quality management and ERP software.

Last reviewed: July 21, 2026